As a rule, if a literature review of research paper becomes part of the introduction, then it does not exceed three thousand characters and describes only key works that are the theoretical framework of the study. Take a look at this example. This is a literature review from a bachelor thesis in cultural studies. In it, the author describes two articles that contain opposing points of view on the problem considered in the study. The author does not attempt to retell these articles in detail, because it includes a literature review in the introduction. Below we describe the two most illustrative sample of literature review in research.
1. Timofey Dmitriev (2013) “This is not the army: national military construction in the USSR in the context of Soviet cultural and national politics (1920–1930s)”. The article analyzes the pragmatics of abandoning the policy of “indigenization”, which was related to the fact that the Soviet army could not function effectively without a single language: draftees from different regions of the USSR, being in the same army, not only did not understand each other because that only the languages of the titular nations were taught in their schools, but they could not carry out the orders of the military authorities.
Find an important fundamental job. It may be the theoretical framework of your research. For example, if you are writing about the Venetian carnival, then a literary review should begin with a description of the book by the researcher of the culture of Mikhail Bakhtin “Creativity of Francois Rabelais and the folk culture of the Middle Ages”.
Make sure that the papers that you want to review in the literature review are relevant to the topic of your research. You can look at another samples of literature review in research papers. You should not include something that is very poorly connected with your research, just to gain more volume, or because you are well acquainted with these works. When you describe some work, be sure to explain why it is necessary for your research.
It is not necessary to completely rewrite in your own words the fragments of texts that you include in the literature review. Highlight the main points and describe (but in detail) only them.
Follow the logic of the text. Ideally, if each work used in literature review is somehow related to the one you described before it. You can also combine the described sources and literature into groups by content, time of writing, the position of the authors, etc.